The National Police Commission (NPC) was appointed by the Government of India in 1977 with wide terms of reference covering the police organisation, its role, functions, accountability, relations with the public, political interference in its work, misuse of powers, evaluation of its performance etc. This was the first Commission appointed at the national level after Independence. The Commission produced eight reports between 1979 and 1981, suggesting wide ranging reforms in the existing police set-up.
The following recommendations have been selected from different reports of the NPC:
First Report:
Complaints against the police:
According to the NPC, any arrangement for inquiry into complaints against police should be acceptable both to police and public as fair and just. The Commission therefore suggested arrangements, which would include inquiries conducted by departmental authorities and those conducted by an independent authority outside the police. The Commission felt that a large number of complaints against police should be looked into and disposed off by the supervisory ranks in the police hierarchy. The Commission however recommended that a judicial inquiry should be made mandatory in the following categories of complaints against the police:
alleged rape of a woman in police custody;
death or grievous hurt caused while in police custody; and
death of two or more persons resulting from police firing in the dispersal of unlawful assemblies.
The judicial inquiry should be held by an Additional Session's Judge nominated for this purpose in every district by State Government in consultation with the High Court. He will be designated as the District Inquiry Authority (DIA) and be assisted by an assessor. The DIA shall send the report of the inquiry to the State Government. It will be mandatory on the part of the government to publish the report and make a decision within two months of receipt of the report.
The DIA shall also serve as an independent authority to oversee the ultimate disposal of complaints dealt with departmentally. To oversee the satisfactory implementation of the entire scheme, a Police Complaint Board should be set up at the state level.
Second Report:
Appointment of the Criminal Justice Commission:
According to the NPC, the police cannot achieve complete success in their work unless all wings of the criminal justice system operate with simultaneous efficiency. It is therefore necessary to set up a body, which would comprehensively monitor the performance of all agencies and apply corrective measures from time to time. The existing Law Commission may be enlarged to function as a Criminal Justice Commission on a statutory basis. Such arrangements at the centre should be supported by similar arrangements at the state level.
Role of Police:
The basic role of the police is to function as a law enforcement agency and render impartial service to law, without any heed to wishes, indications or desires expressed by the government which either come in conflict with, or do not conform to the provisions contained in the constitution or laws. This should be spelt out in the Police Act. The police should have duly recognised their service-oriented role in providing relief to people in distress situations. They should be trained and equipped to perform the service oriented functions.
Political Interference in Police Work:
In the existing set-up, the police function under the executive control of the state government. According to the Commission, the manner in which political control has been exercised over the police in this country has led to gross abuses, resulting in erosion of the rule of law and loss of police credibility as a professional organisation. The threat of transfer / suspension is the most potent weapon in the hands of the politician to bend the police down to his will. The Commission recommended that the superintendence of the state government over the police should be limited to ensure that police performance is in strict accordance with law. In the performance of its tasks, the police should be subject to overall guidance from the government which should lay down broad policies for adoption in different situations. There should however be no instructions in regard to actual operations in the field. In regard to investigation work, in any case, the police are beyond any intervention by the executive or politicians.
To help the state government discharge their superintending responsibility in an open manner under the framework of law, a State Secretary Commission should be setup through law in each state. The State Security Commission should:
lay down broad policy guidelines and directions for the performance of preventive tasks and service-oriented functions by the police;
evaluate the performance of the State Police every year and present a report to the State Legislature;
function as a forum of appeal to dispose of representations from officers regarding their being subjected to illegal orders and regarding their promotions; and
generally keeping the functioning of the police in the state under review.
Statutory Tenure of Service:
The chief of police should be assured of a fixed tenure of office. The tenure may be for four years or for a period extending up to retirement, whichever is earlier. The removal of the chief of police from his post before the expiry of his tenure should require the approval of the State Security Commission.
Selection of Chief of Police:
The head of the police force should be selected from a panel of three IPS officers of that state cadre. The panel should be prepared by a committee headed by the Chairman of the Union Public Service Commission.
Transfer/Suspension Orders:
Police officers should be effectively protected against whimsical and mala fide transfer/suspension orders. There should be a provision in the Police Act, specifying the authorities competent to issue such orders regarding different ranks. Any such orders passed by any authority other than those specified in the Act will be rendered null and void.
Third Report:
Police and the Weaker Sections:
Some important recommendations made by the NPC about police response towards weaker sections of society are summarised below:
The NPC has recommended the establishment of special investigation cell in the police department at the State level to monitor the progress of investigation of cases under the Protection of Civil Rights Act or other atrocities against Scheduled Castes and Tribes. A composite cell may be constituted at the district level under the Sub-Divisional Officer to inquire into complaints emanating from scheduled Castes/Tribes, particularly those relating to lapses in administrative measures meant for their relief.
An important cause for dissatisfaction of weaker sections of society is that the police sometimes do not take cognizance of their complaints of ill treatment at the hands of upper castes on the ground that complaints are non cognizable, and therefore can not be investigated by them without orders from a magistrate. The NPC has recommended that section 155 of the Code of Criminal Procedure should be suitably amended to facilitate appropriate and effective police response to non-cognisable complaints in two categories of cases: (i) to protect a member of the weaker sections from exploitation and injustice, or (ii) to prevent a possible breach of public peace that might result from absence of effective action on complaint of a non-cognisable offence
A comprehensive legislation should be enacted setting out the procedure for the allotment of land to landless poor. Police officers from the local police station should be associated with the act of handing over possession of land to the landless and a brief record of this should be kept in the police station records.
Postings of Officers:
The postings of officers in charge of police stations should be the exclusive responsibility of the district Superintendent of Police. The Chief of Police should be exclusively responsible for selecting and posting Superintendents of Police in charge of districts.
Guidelines for Avoidance of Vexatious Arrests:
Presently the powers of arrest available to the police give ample scope for harassment and humiliation of persons, prompted by mala fide considerations. In actual practice, several persons who ought to be arrested are let free on account of political influence or other considerations, while harmless persons who need not be arrested at all are often arrested and even remanded to police custody on inadequate grounds. Some mala fide arrests get exposed on habeas corpus petitions filed in High Courts but such exposures are rare compared to the large number of unjustified arrests that take place all the time. The NPC has recommended very strict guidelines for making arrests by the police, which should be strictly observed in day-to-day administration by the senior supervisory ranks. However, the State governments are yet to make firm arrangements down the line for observing these guidelines in day-to-day police work.
The NPC also recommended that sections 2(c) and 2(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure should be amended to remove the emphasis on arrest in the definition of cognisable and non-cognisable offences and section 170 of the Code of Criminal Procedure should be amended to remove the impression that it is mandatory to make an arrest in non-bailable cases.
Guidelines regarding use of Handcuffs:
The threat of putting handcuffs on persons under arrest is another source of corruption and harassment. The following guidelines must be observed:
No person shall be handcuffed who, by reason of age, sex or infirmity can be kept in custody without handcuffs.
No person arrested on a bailable offence shall be handcuffed, unless for some special reasons, it is believed that he is likely to escape.
In cases under judicial custody, court's instructions should be obtained before handcuffing the accused.
Under trial prisoners and other accused persons should not be handcuffed and chained unless there is reasonable expectation that such persons will use violence or attempt to escape. The police escort must be sufficiently strong to prevent escape.
Whenever any accused is handcuffed, the fact and reasons should be stated in the Sentry Relief Book.
In no case should prisoners or accused persons, who are aged and bed-ridden in hospitals, or women or juvenile or civil prisoners, be handcuffed or fettered.
Provision of Imprest Money to Police Station:
The Commission noted the non-availability of any imprest money in a police station to meet expenditure on several legitimate needs of the station. It recommended that police stations should be provided with an adequate imprest amount to meet the contingent expenditure in day-to-day work. Adequate funds should be provided at station level to eliminate causes of corruption, which often engulf even the honest officers.
Fourth Report:
Registration of FIR:
Victims of crimes are sometimes turned away from a police station on the mere ground that the reported crime has occurred in the jurisdiction of some other police station and it is for the victim to go there and make his complaint. This works to the disadvantage of ignorant people and weaker sections in society. The NPC has recommended an important amendment to Section 154 Cr.P.C. which would make it incumbent on a police station to register an FIR whether or not the crime has taken place in its jurisdiction and then transfer the FIR to the concerned police station, if necessary.
Examination of Witnesses.
The examination of witnesses should be conducted as far as practicable near the scene of offence or at the residence of witnesses concerned at some convenient place nearby.
Statement of Witnesses:
According to existing law, a police officer is precluded from obtaining the signature of the person whose statement has been recorded by him. The Commission has recommended that he existing practice of recording in detail the statement by a witness during investigation should be done away with. In its place, the Commission has suggested an arrangement in which the investigating officer can record the facts as ascertained by him on examination of a witness. This statement of facts can be in third person in the language of the investigating officer himself and a copy of the statement should be handed over to the witness under acknowledgement. This arrangement would also act as a safeguard against the malpractice of padding of statements which the investigating officers are often accused of doing.
Restoration of Stolen Property to Victims of Crimes:
Presently, properties recovered by the police during investigation or otherwise are first transferred to court custody. Their return to the rightful owner is ordered at a much later stage of the criminal proceedings. During the intervening period, there is considerable risk of damage to the property because of indifferent handling at different stages of police and court custody. Sophisticated electronic goods run a serious risk of irreparable damage. Successful detection of case does not provide any psychological satisfaction to the victims of crime when the lost property is kept away from them for a long period without proper attention and care. NPC has recommended a change in the existing provisions in law to facilitate early return of the recovered property to the victims concerned even at the stage of investigation, protected by appropriate bonds for their safe retention and later production in court.
Compounding Offences:
The NPC has recommended that the police may be empowered in law to compound offences in simple cases even at the stage of police investigation, when both parties to a dispute may themselves like to settle the matter amicably. Due safeguards must of course be provided against a forced or contrived compromise. Presently this facility is available only at the stage of trial. This amendment in law would also reduce the workload in courts.
Intimation about Arrest:
The NPC has recommended a new section 50-A in Chapter V of Cr.P.C. requiring the police to give intimation about the arrest of a person to anyone who may reasonably be named by him to avoid agonising suspense to the members of his family about his whereabouts.
Use of Third Degree Methods:
To reduce the use of third degree methods, the NPC has recommended:
Surprised visits by senior officers to police stations to detect persons held in illegal custody and subjected to ill treatment
The magistrate should be required by rules to question the arrested person if he has any complaint of ill treatment by the police and in case of complaint should get him medically examined.
There should be a mandatory judicial inquiry in cases of death or grievous hurt caused while in police custody
Police performance should not be evaluated on the basis of crime statistics or number of cases solved.
Training institutions should develop scientific interrogation techniques and impart effective instructions to trainees in this regard.
Inspections of courts:
There is need to evolve a scheme of inspections at the level of High Court as well as Sessions Courts to ensure proper functioning of the subordinate courts. A whole time functionary of the rank of a senior District Sessions Judge who is qualified for appointment as High Court Judge may be attached to each High Court to inspect the district courts periodically. A similar functionary of the rank of Additional Sessions Judge may be entrusted with inspections at the district level. The inspecting arrangement proposed above should also ensure the availability of adequate facilities for the witnesses and others who participate in court proceedings.
Attendance of Witnesses:
The allowances payable to witnesses for their attendance in court should be fixed on a realistic basis and their payment should be effected through a simple procedure, which should avoid delay and inconvenience.
Firth Report:
Recruitment to the Police:
Recruitment to the Police must be at two levels only- Constables and Indian Police Service. The recruitment at other levels should be eliminated in a phased manner.
Psychological Tests:
Properly developed psychological tests should form an important part of the selection procedure. The Central Government should develop the psychological tests with the help of the Ministry of Defense.
Evaluation during Training:
The Commission recommended that there should be constant evaluation of the performance, attitudes and behaviour of all recruits during training and those who are not shaping as good policemen should be weeded out.
Control of the District Magistrate:
Presently, under section 4 of the Police Act of 1861, the District Police is subject to the "general control and direction" of the District Magistrate. The NPC felt that this can not be construed as warranting any interference in the internal management of the police force. The police should perform with full accountability to the law of the land. Any rule or regulation which unnecessarily or without purpose subordinates the police to the DM should be removed. However, there are a number of areas, which would require active cooperation of different departments and in such matters coordination by the District Magistrate will be necessary. The role of the District Magistrate as a chief coordinating authority should be recognised and respected by the police. The NPC has prescribed the areas where the District Magistrate can play his role as the coordinating authority.
Causes of Poor Police Public Relations:
Police public relations are in a very unsatisfactory state. Police partiality, corruption, brutality and failure to register cognizable offences are the most important reasons.
Police do in fact harass even those people who try to help them.
Vertical Communication in Police:
Every policeman must develop an attitude of utmost courtesy and consideration towards members of the public who come to him for help. However, the manner in which police personnel at lower levels behave towards public is largely conditioned by the manner in which they are themselves treated by their own higher officers within the force. There is a simultaneous need for reform in behaviour and conduct of police officers towards one another.
Victims of Crime:
The criminal justice system shows no concern for the victim of crime at any stage. The legislation of a Criminal Injuries Compensation Act is recommended.
Need for Transparency:
All police activities, to the extent possible, should be open, except in four specific areas, which are (i) operations, (ii) intelligence on the basis of which operations are planned and conducted (iii) privacy of the individual citizen and (iv) judicial requirements.
Women Police:
The NPC has recommended that women police should be strengthened and assigned investigation work in much greater measure that at present Women police should become an integral part of the police organisation and used to deal with crimes against women and children and in tackling the problem of juvenile delinquency. They should in due course share all the duties now performed by their male counterparts. They should be recruited in much larger numbers than at resent, particularly in the ranks of Assistant Sub-inspectors and Sub-inspectors of Police.
Sixth Report:
Examinations for Promotion of Officers:
Before promotion to the ranks of Superintendent of Police, DIG and IG, all IPS officers should be required to undergo specifically designed pre-promotion courses followed by an examination and an objective selection process.
Those who are not able to qualify for the post of DIG and IG even after being given two more chances should be retired from service.
Creation of Central IPS Cadres:
Two Central IPS Cadres should be constituted - one for the paramilitary organisations and the other for such organisations as IB, CBI, RAW etc.
Police Commissionerate System for Major Cities:
In large urban areas, crime and law and order situations develop rapidly, requiring a speedy and effective operational response from the police. This can be possible only when the police are organised to perform twin basic functions of decision making and implementation. The Commission has therefore recommended that in cities with a population of 5 lakhs and above and even in places where there may be special reasons like speedy urbanisation, industrialisation etc., the system of police commissionerate would provide more effective policing and should be introduced.
Communal Riots:
The National Police Commission felt that during communal riots, adequate interest is not taken in investigation of heinous and serious crimes. For investigation of such cases, special investigating squads under the State CID should be set up comprising officers of proven integrity and impartiality. Vigorous investigation should be followed by prosecution to ensure deterrent punishment to the offenders. Hence withdrawal from trial of cases occurring during communal riots by the State Governments with a view to promoting communal harmony often proves illusory and has to be discouraged.
Reservation in the Force:
The Commission has expressed its view against reservation of vacancies in the police for minorities and other weaker sections on the basis of their share in population. The Commission felt that it would fragment the force along caste and communal lines and it goes against the fundamental police philosophy that it must rise above caste and creed and act impartially as the agent of law and order. The composition of the force should reflect the general mix of communities as it exists in the society and thereby command the confidence of different sections of the society.
Separation of investigating staff from law and order staff:
The NPC has made conflicting recommendations on this subject. While in the Sixth Report, it has suggested the separation of staff at the police station level (Para 48.15), in the Seventh Report, the Commission has expressed an opinion against the bifurcation of staff on the ground that the police work can not be put in water-tight compartments. (Para 50.22)
Seventh Report:
Norms for Police Stations:
A police station in a rural area should not have jurisdiction of more than 150 kms. In urban areas, population density should be one of the main considerations. A police station should not be required to police more than 60,000 population. If it registers more than 700 crimes annually, another police station may be created.
Police stations in cities with more than 900 cognizable IPC offices should have a Dy. SP/ ASP as SHO. Police Stations investigating over 300 IPCs per year should be headed by an Inspector of Police. The third category will consist of smaller police stations headed by Sub Inspectors.
An investigating officer should not be required to investigate more than 50 - 60 IPC cases in India.
Restructuring of Civil Police Hierarchy:
There should be an increase in the strength at middle levels of ASI/SI/Inspector. Increase in the strength of these ranks should be offset by reducing numbers at the lower levels of constabulary. This will provide large number of investigating officers and improve promotional opportunities for the lower ranks.
Management of the Police Force:
The internal management of the police force in the state should be entirely under the purview of the chief of police. The powers of the heads of the state police forces in respect of personnel and financial management and to provide infra-structural facilities for the growth of the police should be enhanced.
Central Law for Armed Police Forces:
There should be a central enactment to ensure uniformity in composition, officering pattern, training, discipline and efficiency of the state armed police battalions.
Establishment of a Central Police Committee:
A Central Police Committee to look after the functions of consultancy and monitoring be created because an expert agency is required by the Central Government and the State Security Commissions to advise them on matters relating to:
(i) police Organisation and police reforms of a general nature;
(ii) central grants and loans to the State Police Forces for their modernisation and development; and
(iii) budgetary allotments to State Police Forces.
The Committee could also make a general evaluation of policing in the country and provide expertise to the State Security Commissions for their own evaluation of they so require.
Establishment of an All India Police Institute:
An all India Police Institute on the lines of similar professional institutions existing for Engineers, Chartered Accountants and other professionals be created. This Institute, when established, should be kept under the proposed Central Police Committee.
Eighth Report:
Police Accountability:
There should be continuous monitoring of the performance of the police forces in the country. The State Security Commission should have an independent cell to evaluate police performance. The annual administration report of the head of the police force and assessment report of the Central Police Committee will provide additional material to the State Security Commission to prepare a final report on the performance of the state police to be placed before the State Legislature.
The police functionaries individually as well as in groups should be sensitised to the idea of accountability to the people.
Withdrawal of Protection:
Sections 132 and 197 of the Cr. P.C. 1973 provide protection to various categories of public servants against any prosecution brought against them relating to performance of off icial duties. The protection available to the police officers under these sections should be withdrawn so that the private complainant is free to press his complaint against police official for a judicial pronouncement without there being a provision to obtain prior permission of the competent authority for such prosecution.
Enactment of a Model Police Act:
The Police Act of 1861 should be replaced by a new Police Act, which not only changes the system of superintendence and control over the police but also enlarges the role of the police to make it function as an agency which promotes the rule of law in the country and renders impartial service to the community.
Response to NPC's Recommendations:
The major recommendations of the NPC have remained unimplemented. There is a deep-seated and strong resistance to the idea of police reforms. Politicians and bureaucrats have developed a great vested interest in retaining control and superintendence over the police organisation. Indicative of the deeply entrenched resistance to police reform is the fact that a letter written on the subject in April 1997 by Shri Indrajit Gupta, the then Union Home Minister to the Chief Ministers of all States exhorting them to rise above narrow partisan or political considerations and introduce police reforms on the lines recommended by the NPC, failed to produce even a single response.
Within the police establishment also, there are those who are content to retain the status quo. Closely associated with powerful interests, they acquiesce in and allow the system to continue.
The existing system is unacceptable. It has resulted in subverting the rule of law and in obstructing the growth of a healthy and professional system of policing. It must change.
No comments:
Post a Comment